<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Victorian Gothic Revival “Papier Mâché” Binding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bookoftheerinyes.com/journal/2009/10/victorian-gothic-revival-papier-mache-binding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bookoftheerinyes.com/journal/2009/10/victorian-gothic-revival-papier-mache-binding/</link>
	<description>Being a True And Illustrated Account of Vengeful Pursuit &#38; Damnation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:43:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Szewczyk</title>
		<link>http://www.bookoftheerinyes.com/journal/2009/10/victorian-gothic-revival-papier-mache-binding/comment-page-1/#comment-6711</link>
		<dc:creator>David Szewczyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 18:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookoftheerinyes.com/journal/?p=116#comment-6711</guid>
		<description>My firm has had copies of the Parables of Our Lord, edited by Henry Noel Humphreys, in both the London and the New York editions and the American edition is different from the London.  The borders are not the same, some line breaks are different,  and where as the London has inconsistent pagination, the American has no pagination.  The bindings, however are, as far as we can tell, identical.  Perhaps the &quot;leaves&quot; sold to Harper were from the London &quot;second&quot; edition?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My firm has had copies of the Parables of Our Lord, edited by Henry Noel Humphreys, in both the London and the New York editions and the American edition is different from the London.  The borders are not the same, some line breaks are different,  and where as the London has inconsistent pagination, the American has no pagination.  The bindings, however are, as far as we can tell, identical.  Perhaps the “leaves” sold to Harper were from the London “second” edition?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper Green Pennington</title>
		<link>http://www.bookoftheerinyes.com/journal/2009/10/victorian-gothic-revival-papier-mache-binding/comment-page-1/#comment-1860</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper Green Pennington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookoftheerinyes.com/journal/?p=116#comment-1860</guid>
		<description>I was delighted to have some information on papier mache bindings...I have a Book of Common Prayer (Eyre &amp; Spottiswoode, London, 1842) with a papier mache binding in my collection and wondered about its unique binding.  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was delighted to have some information on papier mache bindings…I have a Book of Common Prayer (Eyre &amp; Spottiswoode, London, 1842) with a papier mache binding in my collection and wondered about its unique binding.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Victorian Gothic Revival "Papier Mâché" Binding &#124; The Book of the Erinyes Journal -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.bookoftheerinyes.com/journal/2009/10/victorian-gothic-revival-papier-mache-binding/comment-page-1/#comment-920</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Victorian Gothic Revival "Papier Mâché" Binding &#124; The Book of the Erinyes Journal -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 16:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bookoftheerinyes.com/journal/?p=116#comment-920</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ian Talbot, Mia Leijonstedt and Paul Watson. Paul Watson said: Victorian Gothic Revival “Papier Mâché” Bookbinding - http://bit.ly/34CUn3 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Ian Talbot, Mia Leijonstedt and Paul Watson. Paul Watson said: Victorian Gothic Revival “Papier Mâché” Bookbinding — <a href="http://bit.ly/34CUn3" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/34CUn3</a> […]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.526 seconds -->

